The Importance Of Time Efficiency In Inheritance Cases.

Articles Wills & Estate Planning

What happens if you miss the time limit for making a family provision claim against a deceased estate in Western Australia?

In Western Australia, eligible people seeking further provision from a deceased estate generally must commence a claim under the Family Provision Act 1972 within six months of the grant of probate or letters of administration. Courts may allow claims to proceed out of time, but only in limited circumstances after considering factors such as the length of delay, the reasons for it, whether the estate has been distributed, and the strength of the claim. Recent cases demonstrate that even claimants with potentially strong cases can be refused leave if they delay too long. Obtaining prompt legal advice is therefore critical for both potential claimants and estate administrators.

image shows a sand timer with 'last will and testament' documents

Our Estates Team discusses this important topic

Summary

This article explains the time limits for making a claim against a deceased estate under Western Australian law. It outlines the factors the Court may consider when a claim is made out of time and highlights the importance of seeking timely advice before an estate is distributed.

Why are time limits important when dealing with a deceased estate?

When someone passes away, the law tells us that their property should be distributed in accordance with inheritance laws without delay.

The window for taking legal action that seeks to affect a deceased estate is therefore much smaller than that for bringing other kinds of civil actions. Personal representatives should be able to distribute an estate without the threat of legal proceedings hanging over the estate for longer than is necessary.

What is the time limit for making a claim under the Family Provision Act?

The Family Provision Act 1972 (“FPA”) is a WA act which allows certain people to bring an application for further provision from the estate of a deceased person. This kind of action must be commenced within six months of a grant of probate or letters of administration in relation to the estate. This is a substantive provision of the FPA, meaning it is critical – it is not merely a procedural time limit.

What does the Court consider when a claim is made out of time?

In looking at an application to bring FPA proceedings out of time, the Court weighs up factors including:

  • how promptly the plaintiff has made their application for an extension of time
  • what is just and proper in the circumstances
  • whether the estate has been distributed
  • whether the plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for overlooking the general rule
  • whether the plaintiff has had negotiations with the defendant(s)
  • whether the refusal would leave the plaintiff without redress
  • whether the plaintiff has an arguable case

What happens if you miss the time limit for making an estate claim?

Recent decisions of the Master of the Supreme Court of WA demonstrate the serious consequences for potential claimants who miss their window:

What happened in O’Brien v Duthie, Van der Schoor & Prince?

a) O’Brien v Duthie, Van der Schoor & Prince [2017] WASC 227: In this case, two adult children sought and were denied leave to bring FPA proceedings. They made an application for leave in late 2015, more than five years after the grant of probate in the will of their late father. While plaintiffs got legal advice in 2007 and again in 2013, in both instances they decided not to proceed with any claim. The most important factors weighing against a grant of leave were the length of delay (4 ½ years), the fact the delay was not explained adequately, and the fact that the plaintiffs did not have a case that was clearly arguable.

What happened in Drake v Bradshaw?

b) Drake v Bradshaw [2017] WASC 228: In this case, an adult son sought leave to bring FPA proceedings for provision from the estate of his late mother more than two years after the grant of probate. By this time, the estate had been distributed. While the plaintiff had an arguable case (perhaps even a “strong” case), and the delay was due at least in part to his ignorance of the law, the Master found that it would not be in the interests of justice if the plaintiff were granted leave to issue FPA proceedings.

Why should potential claimants seek advice promptly?

As demonstrated, it is crucial that people get timely advice. Even a claimant with a strong case can unwittingly find they are unable to bring a claim if they miss their window. Similarly, personal representatives who are on notice of a potential claim need to know when they can safely distribute the estate.

HHG Legal Group has decades of experience providing specific advice to potential claimants and to executors and beneficiaries of disputed estates.

How can HHG Legal Group help?

Contact us to find out more

Share:

* The information provided in this website serves as a general guide and does not constitute legal advice. It is based on our research and experience at the time of publication. Please consult our knowledgeable legal team for any specific inquiries or advice relevant to your circumstances, as the content may not have been updated subsequently.