fbpx
Your preferred office location:
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Author
  4. /
  5. Blair Campbell
  6. /
  7. Do not ignore a Statutory Demand!
9 May 2022

 Special Counsel, Blair Campbell, in our Dispute Resolution team outlines statutory demands and what to do if you receive a statutory demand.  

Do not ignore a statutory demand! One would think that this would be self-evident, especially since the statutory demand document explicitly states on it:

A failure to respond to a statutory demand can have very serious consequences for a company. In particular, it may result in the company being placed in liquidation and control of the company passing to the liquidator of the company.

However, in recent months we have seen several examples of people who have failed to address a statutory demand and had to deal with the consequences. Some of this might be a hold-over from the COVID measures which raised the debt threshold and extended the period to respond to a statutory demand to six months. However, we think that too many company directors do not appreciate the seriousness of these documents.

What is a statutory demand?

The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) provides a mechanism for creditors to establish a company’s insolvency, triggering the right to have the company wound up. If a company is unable to pay their debts as and when they fall due, including a failure to meet a genuine statutory demand, that company should not be permitted to continue.

This mechanism is set out in s. 459E of the Corporations Act and provides that the demand must:

  1. Specify the debt amount, which must meet the statutory minimum (presently $4,000 as of 1 July 2021),
  2. Must require the company to pay, secure or compound for that amount to the creditor’s reasonable satisfaction within the statutory period after service of the demand (currently 21 days),
  3. Be in writing,
  4. Be in the prescribed form (Form 509H),
  5. Be signed by the creditor or on their behalf,
  6. Be accompanied by an affidavit that verifies the debt unless it is a judgment debt.

A statutory demand is a means of identifying whether a company can meet its debts as and when they fall due. A statutory demand is not an appropriate avenue for debt collection of genuinely disputed debts.

What do I do if I receive a statutory demand?

As indicated above, the Corporations Act gives a company options upon receiving a statutory demand. The company can either:

  1. Pay the amount demanded,
  2. Secure or compound to the creditor’s reasonable satisfaction, or
  3. Apply to set the demand aside.

Pay – if the statutory demand is for a real debt that is not genuinely disputed, the first option would be to pay the debt. Provided the debt is legitimate, a failure to pay is strong evidence of insolvency – justifying the presumption that arises. Money can be paid into Court if the tender of payment is not accepted.

Alternatively, it is possible to compromise the debt.

Secure or compound – a debtor ‘compounds’ when it enters into an agreement with its creditor for payment – either on terms for the demanded sum, or for a different amount.

A company can ‘secure’ a debt by putting up security for the demanded sum.

In relation to both securing and compounding, the act must be to the creditor’s ‘reasonable satisfaction’. This imports an objective standard – meaning that the offer of security or compound cannot be unreasonably rejected.

Set aside the demand

There are several grounds on which a statutory demand can be set aside.

The most common is that a demand will be set aside if the debt on which the statutory demand is genuinely disputed. Importantly, not any dispute will be sufficient – the Court must be satisfied that the dispute is ‘genuine’. While the applicant debtor company carries the burden of persuasion, the threshold is not particularly high.

A demand can also be set aside where the debtor company has an offsetting claim. Importantly the offset must be sufficient to reduce the demand below the statutory minimum of $4,000.

The Court can also set aside a statutory demand for a defect in the demand – but only where the Court is satisfied substantial injustice would be done.

Finally, the Court has a wide discretion to set aside a statutory demand for any other reason. Generally, this will turn on issues regarding the propriety of the issue of the demand, whether there is some compelling reason on the company’s behalf, or whether the demand is a form of abuse. One example we have seen of this is where the debt the subject of the demand is currently being litigated in the Court. Not only is this evidence of a genuine dispute, but the Court generally will not permit its processes to be misused with what amounts to a collateral attack to circumvent the action.

Do nothing

Of course, there is always the option of doing nothing. If this course is chosen, the company is deemed to be insolvent, and the creditors may have the company wound up.

Failing to respond to a statutory demand has consequences. Not only does it give rise to the presumption of insolvency and provide the basis for a winding up order, it also severely limits a company’s ability to defend the subsequent winding up application. A company cannot rely on any ground on which it could have relied to set aside the statutory demand without leave – and leave will only be granted to establish solvency. This means a company may not be able to argue in the winding up proceeding that the demanded debt was genuinely disputed.

Time

In all things statutory demand related – TIME IS CRITICAL.

The deadlines contained in the Corporations Act for statutory demands are tight, and strict.

So, not only do debtor companies have a strict timeframe to pay a statutory demand – they also have the same strict timeframe to apply to set aside the statutory demand.

21 DAYS:

Any application to set aside the statutory demand must support the grounds. It is not enough to lodge a ‘quick and dirty’ application with a cursory affidavit in the hopes of supplementing it at a later stage. If you want to raise an issue in support of your application to set aside the demand – it must be found in your original application and affidavit. The so-called Graywinter principle requires a ‘supporting affidavit’, to at least provide a statement of the material facts on which the applicant intends to rely to show a genuine dispute. It can be brief, it can be in the form of a pleading, it can annex correspondence which sets out the details of the dispute, but it cannot be a mere statement that the debt is disputed and further details will follow.

That said, if a complying affidavit is filed, it can be supplemented at a later time.

Conclusion

The only circumstance in which a statutory demand should be ignored is if you want the company to be wound up in insolvency.

In every other circumstance, you should seek legal advice, you must act urgently, and you need to consider whether you pay, secure or compound, or set aside the demand.

In the recent cases we have seen failure to do so cost one client over six figures to resolve, and the other client ended up being wound up when an arrangement might have been reached.

If you require assistance in relation to any of the information provided above, HHG Legal Group’s lawyers can provide advice to you and your business to minimise your future risk. Contact us today by emailing Blair Campbell on blair.campbell@hhg.com.au or calling us on (08) 9322 1966

*This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. Please consult one of our experienced Legal Team for specific advice relevant to your situation.

Supporting Western Australians for more than 100 years

"Always fast and thorough service. Thank you"

Sitka Pil

"My circumstances at the time I made contact with HHG were dire following my argument being rejected by two no win no fee firms. Following my initial meeting with HHG's employment law team I was left feeling extremely positive by the response and concern shown by HHG in regards to their support of my argument along with their preparedness to pursue an outcome on my behalf.

I accept the fact that nobody really wins in these cases (mental health/ workplace) however the end result was what would be considered most favourable and far in excess of what would have been achieved had I not sought the advice from HHG.

I have no hesitation in recommending HHG to anyone caught up in the messy circumstances I found myself in at the time.

Great advice and five-star commitment to their client!!"

Nathan Lynch

"Thank you for such great assistance with the transaction of Flying Domestics on behalf of Lorna Good. It has been such a pleasure to work with the HHG Legal Group and I look forward to working with you in the future."

Jim Goodwin

"Simon Creek and his team were at all times empathic, professional and confident.  My matter needed to be addressed within a pressing time frame, and their availability at short notice and contact after hours was much appreciated.  It caused me considerable stress, but having such a thoroughly reliable and competent team to call on helped me to feel in control. Although I hope not to need their services again in future, I would be confident in doing so!"

Dr Lana Bell

"A good outcome is what we can expect.  A great outcome is a sign of a company which does the very best for their clients. A very big thank you to Daniel Morris for showing empathy towards my small and much needed legal action.

To HHG Legal Group, thank you for a great outcome.  I would recommend your company to anyone seeking legal services."

Jan Atkinson

"Your support this morning was amazingly kind, not to mention your totally reassuring competence, knowledge and wisdom that you used on my behalf.  It was extremely reassuring to have your knowledgeable support, and I particularly appreciated your real and obvious kindness to me. It means so much at a very difficult time. I'm so grateful to you."

Family Law Client

"Janene was very professional and we established a good rapport quickly. The subject of death and wills can be quite confronting to deal with, however, Janene's approach was soft and accommodating."

Lynette Livesey

"A big thank you to HHG for their professional service, continued support, and wide range of legal knowledge. Our clients have given us nothing but kind words regarding HHG Legal Group and so we have no hesitation in referring and recommending Simon Creek and HHG Legal Group for their outstanding services and legal expertise."

Nigel Plowman, Director at Mckinley Plowman & Associates

"Simon is a friendly and practical legal advisor. I have received great feedback from the clients I have referred to him and his team at HHG Legal Group."

Richard Beal, Director at BDO

"Over the last few years, I have been impressed by Simon’s legal ability, management skills, entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity and people skills. He appears to be that rare breed of lawyer – both knowledgeable and commercial."

Michael Malone, Founder of iiNet

"Our family has been a client of HHG Legal Group over many years.  Business has included drawing up of wills for three generations and preparing of probate for my father in law. I would have no hesitation in recommending HHG Legal Group to anyone requiring such services."

Bernice Climie

"You should be congratulated for the manner in which your staff address clients and we found our dealings with your company, once again a very pleasant experience and we would like to truly thank you for your efforts."

Steve Harvey and Jane Powell

"HHG Legal were absolutely fantastic. Extremely responsive and brought calm to our chaotic family situation through their knowledge and caring attitude. Extremely professional from our very first contact with them and they expertly guided our family though the required legal process over almost a 12 month period."

Amanda Williamson

"Fantastic team! They really care about their client. Tim Colcutt is a 'go that extra mile' guy who gives his client his all. I can't recommend HHG and Tim enough."

Kerry Samson

"I had a fantastic lawyer in Matthew Lilly. He helped me out a great deal with good, sound advice in a friendly, professional manner. First class, thanks Matthew"

Graeme Hammond

"Marine Plant Systems has been working with HHG Legal Group for a few years now and they continually provide first-class service. Their professional advice has been invaluable to our company."

Carolin Grimm - Marine Plant Systems

"We were kept up to date at all times. Pricing was always updated over the time period so we remained "in budget". Personal access to someone whenever I had questions. All in all a great experience without too much fuss."

Rosslyn Tasker - COO Altusq Pty Ltd

"Good service you can count on."

Miles Lee

"HHG Legal Group has provided outstanding support as I have taken the journey of buying a business, their professionalism is beyond reproach. Their assistance throughout the Due Diligence process has been invaluable, I would fully recommend them."

Mark Armitage

"Very friendly and efficient service - what a pleasure working with Matthew."

Jacques Taylor

"I highly recommend Daniel from HHG Lawyer in Mandurah. When dealing with a complicated legal property matter recently I was extremely impressed by Daniel's honesty and integrity and the legal advice I received. I am very happy with the service from HHG Legal."

Tony Walker

"Lisa, thank you so much for representing me in court, honestly, I would not have had the outcome I got without you. Once again, Thank you so much."

Rikeisha

"Matthew Lilly was excellent in processing our project. He achieved the excellent result that we required on our project.

We would give Matthew a 5 star rating.

We will definitely commission Matthew for any further projects if we have the need."

Ray

"I have had the pleasure of being represented by Ms Lisa Riley. Lisa helped me in December 2020 when I was charged. Lisa was extremely supportive, reassuring, and preserved with her investigation of the laws and was able to save me from a terrible outcome. Another incident occurred in August 2021 in which I sought Lisa’s help. Lisa preserved and was very patient with me. This only got resolved this year. When she advised me that she was leaving her old firm, I insisted that she remain my lawyer, as I had the utmost faith in her. Hence I moved over to HHG. Lisa took no shortcuts in my defence and continued to preserve for the toxicology report that ultimately saved me. She kept me up-to-date with the progress and provided support. Having someone as understanding as Lisa was a huge gift, to me and my family. You have gained a huge asset in Lisa joining your firm.

Thank you, Lisa, forever grateful for your work, and if ever needed, I will be sure to refer to you"

Anonymous

"We can highly recommend HHG Legal Group and particularly Mr Blair Campbell (Special Counsel / Dispute Resolution)

Blair worked with us as we navigated a very difficult third party dispute.

Blair’s expertise, wisdom, and the way he guided us in a very measured and calm manner gave us great encouragement and comfort. Blair helped us to focus on what we needed to and to trust the process.

Blair was always responsive to us, he always got back to us very promptly to answer our questions and to help us to step through some really hard days.

We are very grateful for Blair’s expertise and wisdom along with his empathy and care, this truly made the difference for us."

Wayne and Janice Belcher

Preferred office location:

Please select your nearest office location so we can show you the most relevant information.