Your selected location:
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. HHG Articles
  4. /
  5. Draft AS 11000 – 2015 construction contract: A call for clarity and consistency
3 Mar 2015

Standards Australia invites public comment on a draft of its new general conditions for use in construction contracts, called AS 11000 – 2015.  Once published, this Australian Standard is intended to replace the current and popular AS 2124 – 1992 and AS 4000 – 1997.

The proposed changes are summarised in a statement by Standards Australia.

Overall, we consider the proposed changes represent a step forward towards balanced, fair and commercially efficient risk allocation. However, as with all new proposals, there are still a few areas which in our view, require attention:

1. Sub-clause 42.10 (and possibly others) may require amendment to accommodate relevant provisions of the Personal Property Securities Act 2009.  In some instances, that Act (“PPSA”) may entitle another secured creditor to seize the things which, under that clause (as essentially, a retention of title clause), the Principal may retain as security for payment by the Contractor.  For more information about how the PPSA commonly affects the rights of parties to a construction contract, see 


2. Whilst we appreciate that clause 2.1, headed “Good Faith” is meant as a broad statement of the objects and purposes of the contract, we still consider that the term “good faith” would benefit from being defined more precisely.  In considering what parties to a construction contract would have to do in order to be seen to be acting in good faith, we have had regard to the case where an Australian Court first authoritatively implied a duty of good faith into a construction contract.  That decision is Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234.  Taking note of what the NSW Court of Appeal said in that case together with our own experience of what reasonable parties to a construction contract ordinarily expect of each other, we suggest that the duty to act in good faith entails at least the following:

(a) Where the superintendent has to make decisions based on disputed matters of fact, both parties should first be given a fair and equal opportunity to be heard in relation to those facts.  This is called procedural fairness. 

(b) Neither party should exploit some minor, technical irregularity or deficiency in order to derive a disproportionate commercial benefit in a way that does not accord with the spirit of the bargain.  In other words, if a requirement in a contract is designed to protect something that is of commercial value to a party (for example, notice provisions intended to protect the principal’s right to be notified quickly of commercially significant events), that party should invoke the clause only to the extent necessary to achieve its purpose.  Neither party should invoke their rights under the contract for an ulterior purpose such as gaining an unfair advantage over, oppressing or applying undue pressure on, the other party.

(c) Each party should communicate as often as the circumstances require and disclose completely and accurately, any information that it has, and the other party may not have, and that might affect the other party’s commercial interests in connection with the subject matter of the contract or its ability to perform its contractual obligations.

3. Where the contractor informs the principal that a stage of the works under contract has been completed by a subcontractor, but that subcontractor has not been paid yet, sub-clause 41.6 may apply. That sub-clause allows the principal to make a payment to a subcontractor which would otherwise be payable under the contract to the contractor. To the extent that such a payment reduces the amount that the contractor then owes the subcontractor, it will be treated as if it had been paid to the contractor under the contract.

We have no issue in principle with this arrangement.  On the contrary, as long as it keeps the cash flowing and the project moving, it will serve its purpose.  However, if you are a principal in a construction project and are thinking of paying a subcontractor directly under this clause (or its equivalent), we would caution you:

(a) to do so strictly in accordance with this clause; and

(b) to expressly invoke this clause in writing when making the payment.

Otherwise, there is a risk that if the contractor becomes insolvent, the subcontractor will look to you for payment of the balance then owing to the subcontractor for works which it did, under a separate subcontract, in relation to your project.  In that event, the Court may treat your earlier payment to that same subcontractor in connection with the same project as evidence of a relationship between you and the subcontractor.  The Court may then say that, because of this “relationship”, you have voluntarily assumed an obligation to pay for the subcontractor’s works directly or alternatively, you are not entitled to take the benefit of those works without first paying its “fair value” to the subcontractor.  Principals have been ordered to pay the “fair value” of subcontractors’ works in similar circumstances in Liebe v Malloy (1906) 4 CLR 347 and more recently (and on different legal grounds) in ABB Power Generation Ltd v Chapple & Ors [2001] WASCA 412.  The first was a decision of the High Court, which is the highest court in Australia and the other was a decision of the WA Court of Appeal. This means that the right of subcontractors, in some circumstances, to recover payment from principals even without any written contract between them, is now beyond dispute.

This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. If you would like further information in relation to this matter or other legal matters please contact our office on Freecall 1800 609 945 or email us now.



*This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. Please consult one of our experienced Legal Team for specific advice relevant to your situation.

Supporting Western Australians for more than 100 years

"Always fast and thorough service. Thank you"


My circumstances at the time I made contact with HHG were dire following my argument being rejected by two no win no fee firms. Following my initial meeting with HHG's employment law team I was left feeling extremely positive by the response and concern shown by HHG in regards to their support of my argument along with their preparedness to pursue an outcome on my behalf.

I accept the fact that nobody really wins in these cases (mental health/ workplace) however the end result was what would be considered most favourable and far in excess of what would have been achieved had I not sought the advice from HHG.

I have no hesitation in recommending HHG to anyone caught up in the messy circumstances I found myself in at the time.

Great advice and five-star commitment to their client!!"


"Thank you for such great assistance with the transaction of Flying Domestics on behalf of Lorna Good. It has been such a pleasure to work with the HHG Legal Group and I look forward to working with you in the future."


"Simon Creek and his team were at all times empathic, professional and confident.  My matter needed to be addressed within a pressing time frame, and their availability at short notice and contact after hours was much appreciated.  It caused me considerable stress, but having such a thoroughly reliable and competent team to call on helped me to feel in control. Although I hope not to need their services again in future, I would be confident in doing so!"


"A good outcome is what we can expect.  A great outcome is a sign of a company which does the very best for their clients. A very big thank you to Daniel Morris for showing empathy towards my small and much needed legal action.

To HHG Legal Group, thank you for a great outcome.  I would recommend your company to anyone seeking legal services."


"Your support this morning was amazingly kind, not to mention your totally reassuring competence, knowledge and wisdom that you used on my behalf.  It was extremely reassuring to have your knowledgeable support, and I particularly appreciated your real and obvious kindness to me. It means so much at a very difficult time. I'm so grateful to you."

Family Law Client

"Janene was very professional and we established a good rapport quickly. The subject of death and wills can be quite confronting to deal with, however, Janene's approach was soft and accommodating."


"A big thank you to HHG for their professional service, continued support, and wide range of legal knowledge. Our clients have given us nothing but kind words regarding HHG Legal Group and so we have no hesitation in referring and recommending Simon Creek and HHG Legal Group for their outstanding services and legal expertise."


"Simon is a friendly and practical legal advisor. I have received great feedback from the clients I have referred to him and his team at HHG Legal Group."


"Over the last few years, I have been impressed by Simon’s legal ability, management skills, entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity and people skills. He appears to be that rare breed of lawyer – both knowledgeable and commercial."


"Our family has been a client of HHG Legal Group over many years.  Business has included drawing up of wills for three generations and preparing of probate for my father in law. I would have no hesitation in recommending HHG Legal Group to anyone requiring such services."


"You should be congratulated for the manner in which your staff address clients and we found our dealings with your company, once again a very pleasant experience and we would like to truly thank you for your efforts."

Steve and Jane

"HHG Legal were absolutely fantastic. Extremely responsive and brought calm to our chaotic family situation through their knowledge and caring attitude. Extremely professional from our very first contact with them and they expertly guided our family though the required legal process over almost a 12 month period."


"Fantastic team! They really care about their client. Tim Colcutt is a 'go that extra mile' guy who gives his client his all. I can't recommend HHG and Tim enough."


"I had a fantastic lawyer in Matthew Lilly. He helped me out a great deal with good, sound advice in a friendly, professional manner. First class, thanks Matthew"


"Marine Plant Systems has been working with HHG Legal Group for a few years now and they continually provide first-class service. Their professional advice has been invaluable to our company."


"We were kept up to date at all times. Pricing was always updated over the time period so we remained "in budget". Personal access to someone whenever I had questions. All in all a great experience without too much fuss."


"Good service you can count on."


"HHG Legal Group has provided outstanding support as I have taken the journey of buying a business, their professionalism is beyond reproach. Their assistance throughout the Due Diligence process has been invaluable, I would fully recommend them."


"Very friendly and efficient service - what a pleasure working with Matthew."


"I highly recommend Daniel from HHG Lawyer in Mandurah. When dealing with a complicated legal property matter recently I was extremely impressed by Daniel's honesty and integrity and the legal advice I received. I am very happy with the service from HHG Legal."


Select your location:

Please select your nearest office location so we can show you the most relevant information.