Your preferred office location:
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. HHG Articles
  4. /
  5. Genetic Parents – Three’s a Crowd
16 Feb 2015

In Western Australia, section 53I of the Human Reproductive Technology Act 1991 (WA) prohibits the use of DNA of more than two people to create an embryo.  Other Australian states and territories have equivalent provisions. The Australian Government may reconsider this ban, following the recent UK House of Commons vote in favour of relaxing artificial reproductive technology laws to allow research into the creation of embryos using DNA from three people.  The impetus behind this change is to allow the development of and research into techniques that utilise DNA from three people with a view to preventing children inheriting a mitochondrial disease.

Mitochondrial disease is the name given to a group of genetic disorders passed from mothers to children.  Symptoms are variable, but include difficulties in mobility, multi-organ failure and heart, liver and muscle conditions.  The condition has no single treatment and no cure – hence treatment is focussed on prevention strategies, which include manipulation of DNA to prevent transmission. 

The procedure in question involves removing the small amount of defective genetic material from the affected mother’s DNA and replacing that material with healthy DNA from a female donor.  That donor contributes approximately 0.2% of the total DNA to the embryo.  The child will effectively therefore have the genetic material of two mothers and one father.  The now healthy DNA will be passed on to the child and the risk of mitochondrial disease hopefully removed for that child and all subsequent generations.

The obvious question this raises for family law in Australia is “can a child have three parents”?

Definition of a Parent
The issue of determining who is a parent to a child arises because some of the provisions of the Family Law Act 1975 (“the Act”) apply to parents only – despite the fact that the Act does not actually define “parent”.  In particular the concept of a “parent” is critical to section 61C of the Act, which relates to parental responsibility and to section 61DA which sets out the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility.

Presumptions of Parentage
The Act contains a number of presumptions of parentage – this means that in certain situations it is presumed that a person is a parent of a child in without any other evidence.  Those situations are as follows:
1) where a man was married to the mother and the child was born: 

        a. during their marriage 

        b. within 44 weeks of the marriage ending by death or annulment

        c. if the couple separated but then lived together again for less than three months and the child               was born within 44 weeks 

2) where a man cohabited with the mother (but they were not married) at any time from 44 to 20               weeks before the child was born. 

3) where a man is on the Birth Certificate as the father or has signed a legal document (such as a               statutory declaration) swearing that he is the father.
4) where a Court has made a statement in the past that the man is the father. These parentage                 presumptions are rebuttable.  This means that a person can provide evidence to disprove a                     presumption of parentage.

Assisted Reproductive Technology
We as a society have now moved beyond a situation where children are born to one woman and one man in the context of a marriage.  There is now a diversity of family structures and situations.  They include:

1. Two biological parents
2. One biological parent
3. A biological parent and a nonbiological parent of the opposite sex
4. A biological parent and a nonbiological parent of the same sex
5. Two lesbian parents each of whom has had a biological child within their relationship
6. More than two parents (a lesbian couple and the biological father or a gay male couple and a                   surrogate mother who maintains a relationship with the child). 

The Family Law Amendment (De facto Financial Matters and Other Measures) Act 2008 introduced amendments to Section 60H of the Act in an attempt to address parentage in situations where children are born as a result of assisted reproductive technologies.  Specifically Section 60H deals with who is actually a parent in such situations, as follows:

1) If the woman was either married or living with a partner on a genuine domestic basis (section                 60H(4)) at the time the artificial conception occurred, then, if the procedure was carried out                 either with the consent of the woman and her partner the child is presumed to be the child of               both the woman and her partner, regardless of the fact that the child is not biologically the child           of the woman and her partner (section 60H(1)).

2) If a man and woman are living together on a genuine domestic basis, or are married, the consent           element is presumed unless and until the contrary is proved (section 60H(5)). See Re Michael:                 Surrogacy Arrangements [2009] FamCA 691.

3) If the donor of DNA material for a child born as a result of an artificial conception is not in a                   marriage or de facto relationship with the birth mother, then the child is not a child of the donor.

Section 60H presumes that a child that is born as a result of assisted or artificial conception will have DNA material from two people rather than three.  If a child is born as a result of assisted conception involving three parents, as is contemplated by the mitochondrial disease research that has been approved in the UK, there may well be a need to amend the Act further to cover such a scenario. Watch this space!

This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. If you would like further information in relation to this matter or other legal matters please contact our office on Freecall 1800 609 945 or email us now.


*This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. Please consult one of our experienced Legal Team for specific advice relevant to your situation.

Supporting Western Australians for more than 100 years

"Always fast and thorough service. Thank you"

Sitka Pil

"My circumstances at the time I made contact with HHG were dire following my argument being rejected by two no win no fee firms. Following my initial meeting with HHG's employment law team I was left feeling extremely positive by the response and concern shown by HHG in regards to their support of my argument along with their preparedness to pursue an outcome on my behalf.

I accept the fact that nobody really wins in these cases (mental health/ workplace) however the end result was what would be considered most favourable and far in excess of what would have been achieved had I not sought the advice from HHG.

I have no hesitation in recommending HHG to anyone caught up in the messy circumstances I found myself in at the time.

Great advice and five-star commitment to their client!!"

Nathan Lynch

"Thank you for such great assistance with the transaction of Flying Domestics on behalf of Lorna Good. It has been such a pleasure to work with the HHG Legal Group and I look forward to working with you in the future."

Jim Goodwin

"Simon Creek and his team were at all times empathic, professional and confident.  My matter needed to be addressed within a pressing time frame, and their availability at short notice and contact after hours was much appreciated.  It caused me considerable stress, but having such a thoroughly reliable and competent team to call on helped me to feel in control. Although I hope not to need their services again in future, I would be confident in doing so!"

Dr Lana Bell

"A good outcome is what we can expect.  A great outcome is a sign of a company which does the very best for their clients. A very big thank you to Daniel Morris for showing empathy towards my small and much needed legal action.

To HHG Legal Group, thank you for a great outcome.  I would recommend your company to anyone seeking legal services."

Jan Atkinson

"Your support this morning was amazingly kind, not to mention your totally reassuring competence, knowledge and wisdom that you used on my behalf.  It was extremely reassuring to have your knowledgeable support, and I particularly appreciated your real and obvious kindness to me. It means so much at a very difficult time. I'm so grateful to you."

Family Law Client

"Janene was very professional and we established a good rapport quickly. The subject of death and wills can be quite confronting to deal with, however, Janene's approach was soft and accommodating."

Lynette Livesey

"A big thank you to HHG for their professional service, continued support, and wide range of legal knowledge. Our clients have given us nothing but kind words regarding HHG Legal Group and so we have no hesitation in referring and recommending Simon Creek and HHG Legal Group for their outstanding services and legal expertise."

Nigel Plowman, Director at Mckinley Plowman & Associates

"Simon is a friendly and practical legal advisor. I have received great feedback from the clients I have referred to him and his team at HHG Legal Group."

Richard Beal, Director at BDO

"Over the last few years, I have been impressed by Simon’s legal ability, management skills, entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity and people skills. He appears to be that rare breed of lawyer – both knowledgeable and commercial."

Michael Malone, Founder of iiNet

"Our family has been a client of HHG Legal Group over many years.  Business has included drawing up of wills for three generations and preparing of probate for my father in law. I would have no hesitation in recommending HHG Legal Group to anyone requiring such services."

Bernice Climie

"You should be congratulated for the manner in which your staff address clients and we found our dealings with your company, once again a very pleasant experience and we would like to truly thank you for your efforts."

Steve Harvey and Jane Powell

"HHG Legal were absolutely fantastic. Extremely responsive and brought calm to our chaotic family situation through their knowledge and caring attitude. Extremely professional from our very first contact with them and they expertly guided our family though the required legal process over almost a 12 month period."

Amanda Williamson

"Fantastic team! They really care about their client. Tim Colcutt is a 'go that extra mile' guy who gives his client his all. I can't recommend HHG and Tim enough."

Kerry Samson

"I had a fantastic lawyer in Matthew Lilly. He helped me out a great deal with good, sound advice in a friendly, professional manner. First class, thanks Matthew"

Graeme Hammond

"Marine Plant Systems has been working with HHG Legal Group for a few years now and they continually provide first-class service. Their professional advice has been invaluable to our company."

Carolin Grimm - Marine Plant Systems

"We were kept up to date at all times. Pricing was always updated over the time period so we remained "in budget". Personal access to someone whenever I had questions. All in all a great experience without too much fuss."

Rosslyn Tasker - COO Altusq Pty Ltd

"Good service you can count on."

Miles Lee

"HHG Legal Group has provided outstanding support as I have taken the journey of buying a business, their professionalism is beyond reproach. Their assistance throughout the Due Diligence process has been invaluable, I would fully recommend them."

Mark Armitage

"Very friendly and efficient service - what a pleasure working with Matthew."

Jacques Taylor

"I highly recommend Daniel from HHG Lawyer in Mandurah. When dealing with a complicated legal property matter recently I was extremely impressed by Daniel's honesty and integrity and the legal advice I received. I am very happy with the service from HHG Legal."

Tony Walker

"Lisa, thank you so much for representing me in court, honestly, I would not have had the outcome I got without you. Once again, Thank you so much."


"Matthew Lilly was excellent in processing our project. He achieved the excellent result that we required on our project.

We would give Matthew a 5 star rating.

We will definitely commission Matthew for any further projects if we have the need."


"I have had the pleasure of being represented by Ms Lisa Riley. Lisa helped me in December 2020 when I was charged. Lisa was extremely supportive, reassuring, and preserved with her investigation of the laws and was able to save me from a terrible outcome. Another incident occurred in August 2021 in which I sought Lisa’s help. Lisa preserved and was very patient with me. This only got resolved this year. When she advised me that she was leaving her old firm, I insisted that she remain my lawyer, as I had the utmost faith in her. Hence I moved over to HHG. Lisa took no shortcuts in my defence and continued to preserve for the toxicology report that ultimately saved me. She kept me up-to-date with the progress and provided support. Having someone as understanding as Lisa was a huge gift, to me and my family. You have gained a huge asset in Lisa joining your firm.

Thank you, Lisa, forever grateful for your work, and if ever needed, I will be sure to refer to you"


"We can highly recommend HHG Legal Group and particularly Mr Blair Campbell (Special Counsel / Dispute Resolution)

Blair worked with us as we navigated a very difficult third party dispute.

Blair’s expertise, wisdom, and the way he guided us in a very measured and calm manner gave us great encouragement and comfort. Blair helped us to focus on what we needed to and to trust the process.

Blair was always responsive to us, he always got back to us very promptly to answer our questions and to help us to step through some really hard days.

We are very grateful for Blair’s expertise and wisdom along with his empathy and care, this truly made the difference for us."

Wayne and Janice Belcher

Preferred office location:

Please select your nearest office location so we can show you the most relevant information.