Your preferred office location:
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Author
  4. /
  5. Blair Campbell
  6. /
  7. Appeals from the Minor Cases Division of the Magistrates Court – Traps for the Unwary
30 Jun 2022

Special Counsel, Blair Campbell, in our Dispute Resolution team outlines the not so appealing issues with civil appeals from the Magistrates Court.

While the right of appeal can be restricted, it is a right that is firmly embedded in our system of justice. As a result, most people expect that if you receive a decision that you believe is wrong, you should have the right to appeal it to a new decision-maker.

However, there is also a public interest in the determination of disputes, and that there be certainty and finality of claims.

Given the purpose of the minor cases division to enable the resolution of small claims with the maximum degree of efficiency, to act without the need for lawyers, and to minimise complexity and cost, it makes sense to limit avenues of appeal.

Balancing these two competing interests can be challenging. And so, we turn to appeals from the Minor Cases division of the Western Australian Magistrates Court.

The Right of Appeal

The right of appeal from Civil decisions in the Magistrates Court – both Minor Cases and in the General division – is governed by the Magistrates Court (Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (the MCCP Act). While s. 40(1) of the MCCP Act provides a right of appeal for cases other than minor cases, s. 32 governs minor cases.

There is an important distinction between these two sections. The MCCP Act talks about two types of decisions that can be made in civil actions in the Magistrates Court:

  1. Decisions in the course of proceedings – typically case management or interlocutory decisions, and
  2. Judgments

Section 40 permits appeals in matters that are not minor cases in both categories of decisions. Section 32 provides that there is no right of appeal except in limited circumstances, however none of the listed exceptions applies to decisions in the course of proceedings. That means that in minor cases, there is no appeal of case management decisions. Appeals in minor cases are limited to judgments.

However, even for judgments in minor cases, appeals are limited and must meet certain requirements.

Firstly, an appeal against a judgment by a Registrar (typically this will be judgments made administratively) is to a Magistrate, while appeals from judgments made by a Magistrate will be to the District Court.

Secondly, the MCCP Act limits the grounds of appeal against a judgment in a minor case to only the following issues:

  1. Want of jurisdiction in the case – either the Court or the minor case division lacks the jurisdiction to deal with the claim,
  2. Want of jurisdiction in the judgment – the decision made is not within the power of the Court, or
  3. Denial of Natural Justice – typically either a breach of the hearing rule, or the bias rule.

It is not enough that the decision was wrong in fact or law, or even against the weight of the evidence[1].

Thirdly, Rule 51(3) of the District Court Rules requires that any grounds of appeal must be set out with proper particulars. It is not sufficient to allege the decision was wrong or unfair, it must set out why and/or how the decision was either lacking jurisdiction, or how the appellant was denied natural justice.

A failure to set out proper grounds could result in the grounds being struck out pursuant to either s. 43(4) of the MCCP Act, or Rule 57(2)(b) of the District Court Rules.

Finally, an appeal to the District Court from a decision of a Magistrate is governed by Part 7 of the MCCP Act – which states at s. 40(3) that an appeal must be commenced within 21 days of the date of judgment, unless leave is granted to bring the appeal out of time.


Pursuant to s. 31 of the MCCP Act the general rule is that costs will not be payable in a minor case, however, that does not apply to an appeal to the District Court. In an appeal to the District Court the relevant provision as to costs is found in Rule 59 of the District Court Rules[2], which provides that the costs of an appeal to the District Court are within the discretion of the Court.

It should not be assumed that an appeal can be commenced and that the parties will be as immune to costs as they normally are in the minor cases division.

An Interesting Quirk

One perhaps unexpected result of the above is that it is surprisingly difficult to appeal from a springing (or self-executing) order, and the judgment which flows from it.

To illustrate, the writer recently obtained a springing order in the minor cases division of the Magistrates Court. The order was made by a Magistrate and provided that the Claimant – who had already been in default of an order to produce witness outlines – file and serve their witness outlines within two weeks, or their claim be struck out and judgment be entered for the Defendants.

Two weeks passed with no outlines, so a few days after the deadline a further order was made by a Registrar striking out the claim, and entering judgment for the Defendants.

The question for the Claimant – who had just had judgment entered against them – was, which decision to appeal?

If they were to appeal the Registrar’s decision granting judgment, they would be bound to appeal to a Magistrate – and likely the very Magistrate who had made the springing order.

If they were to appeal the decision granting the springing order, they would be entitled to apply to the District Court, but the other issues that would arise would be that they were:

  1. Out of time,
  2. Unable to appeal because it would be an appeal of a decision made in the course of proceedings, and
  3. Unable to establish that
  • The case or decision was outside the jurisdiction of the Court, as the Court clearly had jurisdiction over the subject matter of the case, and to grant a springing order and dismiss the case; or
  • There had been a denial of natural justice, as they had been present when the original programming order for provision of witness outlines were made, and the springing order was a consequence of their default.

In the writer’s situation, the Claimant appealed the judgment to the District Court, and stated in the grounds of appeal that the decision was “unjust and unfair”. The writer sent the Appellant a letter setting out the issues above and advising her that her appeal was unsustainable.

When the appeal was not withdrawn, an application was made for summary judgment, alternatively strike out of all appeal grounds on the basis the grounds were embarrassing, alternatively strike out for want of jurisdiction, plus costs.

The first return of the application for summary judgment was listed together with the first appeal mention. The Registrar, having read the Defendants’ affidavit which annexed our letter pointing out all the issues with the appeal, ordered the appeal struck out for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to s. 65 of the District Court Act. Although we applied for a special costs order on the basis of the letter (which contained a Calderbank Offer), only a normal costs order was made against the Appellant.

And so you see how a Claimant, who had brought a matter in the minor cases division believing they would not be exposed to costs, ended up with their hopeless appeal struck out at the first opportunity, and a negative costs order – on top of their original claim being dismissed.

The lesson to be learned, be sure that you do not have an order made against you in a minor cases claim, because they are very hard to appeal, and bringing an appeal exposes you to the risk of costs.

Another lesson to be learned, while a minor case can probably be brought without legal representation, one needs to be more careful with an appeal that proper advice is sought and the formal requirements complied with. It may not be appropriate for most people to do without legal assistance.

If you would like HHG to assist with this process, please contact one of please contact our Dispute Resolution lawyers on (08) 9322 1966 or email reception@hhg.com.au  

[1] However, query whether Wednesbury-style unreasonableness may give rise to the sufficient lack of jurisdiction and denial of natural justice.

[2] And s. 43(7)(e) which applies by virtue of s. 32(2)(a) 

*This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. Please consult one of our experienced Legal Team for specific advice relevant to your situation.

Supporting Western Australians for more than 100 years

"Always fast and thorough service. Thank you"

Sitka Pil

"My circumstances at the time I made contact with HHG were dire following my argument being rejected by two no win no fee firms. Following my initial meeting with HHG's employment law team I was left feeling extremely positive by the response and concern shown by HHG in regards to their support of my argument along with their preparedness to pursue an outcome on my behalf.

I accept the fact that nobody really wins in these cases (mental health/ workplace) however the end result was what would be considered most favourable and far in excess of what would have been achieved had I not sought the advice from HHG.

I have no hesitation in recommending HHG to anyone caught up in the messy circumstances I found myself in at the time.

Great advice and five-star commitment to their client!!"

Nathan Lynch

"Thank you for such great assistance with the transaction of Flying Domestics on behalf of Lorna Good. It has been such a pleasure to work with the HHG Legal Group and I look forward to working with you in the future."

Jim Goodwin

"Simon Creek and his team were at all times empathic, professional and confident.  My matter needed to be addressed within a pressing time frame, and their availability at short notice and contact after hours was much appreciated.  It caused me considerable stress, but having such a thoroughly reliable and competent team to call on helped me to feel in control. Although I hope not to need their services again in future, I would be confident in doing so!"

Dr Lana Bell

"A good outcome is what we can expect.  A great outcome is a sign of a company which does the very best for their clients. A very big thank you to Daniel Morris for showing empathy towards my small and much needed legal action.

To HHG Legal Group, thank you for a great outcome.  I would recommend your company to anyone seeking legal services."

Jan Atkinson

"Your support this morning was amazingly kind, not to mention your totally reassuring competence, knowledge and wisdom that you used on my behalf.  It was extremely reassuring to have your knowledgeable support, and I particularly appreciated your real and obvious kindness to me. It means so much at a very difficult time. I'm so grateful to you."

Family Law Client

"Janene was very professional and we established a good rapport quickly. The subject of death and wills can be quite confronting to deal with, however, Janene's approach was soft and accommodating."

Lynette Livesey

"A big thank you to HHG for their professional service, continued support, and wide range of legal knowledge. Our clients have given us nothing but kind words regarding HHG Legal Group and so we have no hesitation in referring and recommending Simon Creek and HHG Legal Group for their outstanding services and legal expertise."

Nigel Plowman, Director at Mckinley Plowman & Associates

"Simon is a friendly and practical legal advisor. I have received great feedback from the clients I have referred to him and his team at HHG Legal Group."

Richard Beal, Director at BDO

"Over the last few years, I have been impressed by Simon’s legal ability, management skills, entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity and people skills. He appears to be that rare breed of lawyer – both knowledgeable and commercial."

Michael Malone, Founder of iiNet

"Our family has been a client of HHG Legal Group over many years.  Business has included drawing up of wills for three generations and preparing of probate for my father in law. I would have no hesitation in recommending HHG Legal Group to anyone requiring such services."

Bernice Climie

"You should be congratulated for the manner in which your staff address clients and we found our dealings with your company, once again a very pleasant experience and we would like to truly thank you for your efforts."

Steve Harvey and Jane Powell

"HHG Legal were absolutely fantastic. Extremely responsive and brought calm to our chaotic family situation through their knowledge and caring attitude. Extremely professional from our very first contact with them and they expertly guided our family though the required legal process over almost a 12 month period."

Amanda Williamson

"Fantastic team! They really care about their client. Tim Colcutt is a 'go that extra mile' guy who gives his client his all. I can't recommend HHG and Tim enough."

Kerry Samson

"I had a fantastic lawyer in Matthew Lilly. He helped me out a great deal with good, sound advice in a friendly, professional manner. First class, thanks Matthew"

Graeme Hammond

"Marine Plant Systems has been working with HHG Legal Group for a few years now and they continually provide first-class service. Their professional advice has been invaluable to our company."

Carolin Grimm - Marine Plant Systems

"We were kept up to date at all times. Pricing was always updated over the time period so we remained "in budget". Personal access to someone whenever I had questions. All in all a great experience without too much fuss."

Rosslyn Tasker - COO Altusq Pty Ltd

"Good service you can count on."

Miles Lee

"HHG Legal Group has provided outstanding support as I have taken the journey of buying a business, their professionalism is beyond reproach. Their assistance throughout the Due Diligence process has been invaluable, I would fully recommend them."

Mark Armitage

"Very friendly and efficient service - what a pleasure working with Matthew."

Jacques Taylor

"I highly recommend Daniel from HHG Lawyer in Mandurah. When dealing with a complicated legal property matter recently I was extremely impressed by Daniel's honesty and integrity and the legal advice I received. I am very happy with the service from HHG Legal."

Tony Walker

"Lisa, thank you so much for representing me in court, honestly, I would not have had the outcome I got without you. Once again, Thank you so much."


"Matthew Lilly was excellent in processing our project. He achieved the excellent result that we required on our project.

We would give Matthew a 5 star rating.

We will definitely commission Matthew for any further projects if we have the need."


"I have had the pleasure of being represented by Ms Lisa Riley. Lisa helped me in December 2020 when I was charged. Lisa was extremely supportive, reassuring, and preserved with her investigation of the laws and was able to save me from a terrible outcome. Another incident occurred in August 2021 in which I sought Lisa’s help. Lisa preserved and was very patient with me. This only got resolved this year. When she advised me that she was leaving her old firm, I insisted that she remain my lawyer, as I had the utmost faith in her. Hence I moved over to HHG. Lisa took no shortcuts in my defence and continued to preserve for the toxicology report that ultimately saved me. She kept me up-to-date with the progress and provided support. Having someone as understanding as Lisa was a huge gift, to me and my family. You have gained a huge asset in Lisa joining your firm.

Thank you, Lisa, forever grateful for your work, and if ever needed, I will be sure to refer to you"


"We can highly recommend HHG Legal Group and particularly Mr Blair Campbell (Special Counsel / Dispute Resolution)

Blair worked with us as we navigated a very difficult third party dispute.

Blair’s expertise, wisdom, and the way he guided us in a very measured and calm manner gave us great encouragement and comfort. Blair helped us to focus on what we needed to and to trust the process.

Blair was always responsive to us, he always got back to us very promptly to answer our questions and to help us to step through some really hard days.

We are very grateful for Blair’s expertise and wisdom along with his empathy and care, this truly made the difference for us."

Wayne and Janice Belcher

"Thank you for everything. You have made the whole process very easy and virtually stress-free. I can’t thank you all enough for all that you have done and I’m very grateful for the manner in which you have gone about your Profession. "

D’Arcy Parker

"The process of working through the settlement of our father's estate presented us with a potentially challenging and complex undertaking. We would like to thank Simon, Alyce, and the team at HHG for taking on this work in such a thorough, thoughtful, and professional manner. Our family is very grateful for the help and advice that they have provided, and we highly recommend their services to anyone who needs the professional support that HHG provides."

With warm gratitude on behalf of the Pitman family

Preferred office location:

Please select your nearest office location so we can show you the most relevant information.