Your preferred office location:
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. HHG Articles
  4. /
  5. Construction contractors go without payment under contract
14 Jan 2019

Written by Daniel Morris, Special Counsel, Commercial Litigation

Construction contractors sometimes end up doing work without a right to payment under a contract. There can be several reasons for this:

  • the owner or upstream contractor abandoned the contract or breached it in such a serious way that the contract was terminated before practical completion;
  • the owner or upstream contractor became insolvent before practical completion;
  • the contract was illegal (this most commonly happens where a verbal home building contract is used but the law requires it to be in writing); or
  • the contractor was engaged to carry out urgent works under a letter of intent and then, no formal contract ever came into existence.

For 119 years,[1] the law has recognised a construction contractor’s right to be paid the “fair value” of their work, where they do not have any right to payment under a construction contract.

Some Judges, senior lawyers and academics have maintained over the decades, that there is no real basis in law for contractors to have this fair value payment right. Our special counsel, Daniel Morris, has sought to justify why the law can and should recognise contractors’ continuing right to fair value payments outside of any contract, in a paper awarded the Society of Construction Law’s 2014 Brooking Prize and published in the authoritative Australian Law Journal.[2]

Twice, the High Court, Australia’s highest court, has been asked for special leave (permission) to hear an appeal to overturn that legal right. Twice, the High Court has refused special leave (in 1992[3] and again, in 2010[4]). In 2018, special leave was sought for a third time. On 14 December 2018, for the first time in 119 years, special leave was granted.

The case was Mann and Anor v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd (M151/2018). In that case, special leave to reconsider the right to fair value payments of contractors with no contract was granted to owners who, according to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal,[5] had caused the construction contract to fail by their own repudiation of it.

If the owners are successful in that appeal, contractors may in future have to resort to claims for the lost opportunity to earn the profit they could have made had the works been allowed to progress to practical completion. However, for a variety of reasons, such claims are sometimes unavailable, or otherwise inadequate to compensate contractors for the work they have done and not been paid for. An alternative payment right may still exist in such cases, should the Court find that, instead of “fair value”, the contractor can still claim a progress payment under the contract, even though that contract has been terminated.

However, this may not be enough to relieve the contractor where the contract itself has been lost. This is because, for a contractor, the contract’s true value is in more than just the right to progress payments. When a contractor agrees to do construction work, they are agreeing to invest a substantial sum of money upfront in mobilisation, labour and other procurement and planning costs, in the hope and expectation of profiting at the end of the job, when they have finally earned the contract price. If they are engaged in high-profile public or landmark works, it may even be their reputation at stake.

Often, at the early stages of construction works, the cost of delivering the works exceed the progress payments that the contractor can claim under the contract. This often means that when the contract is terminated early, the contractor will not yet have achieved a return on their investment in the construction works. Seen in this way, “fair value” awards take account of the true value of the lost contract to the contractor whilst progress payments alone do not.

Because of this, a High Court win for the owners in the Mann case may mean that contractors who, through no fault of their own, lose their contracts part-way through construction works, will need to make radical changes to their contracting practices. Rather than having a fairly even spread of progress payments at defined stages in the course of their works, contractors may need to insist on higher up-front deposits and front-load their early progress payments, to manage the risk of their investment and possibly their livelihood, being lost with their contract. If it becomes more common to front-load progress payments in this way, this may mean a greater portion of the owner’s capital being tied up earlier on in a typical construction project which could inflate the cost of construction activity as a whole. Despite surface appearances, then, a win for the owners in Mann may be no win for owners at all.


[1] Since the decision in Slowey v Lodder (1900) 20 NZLR 321

[2] In “Restitution Sans Rescission: Exposing the Myth of a Fallacy” (2015) 89 ALJ 117

[3] When the owner sought special leave to appeal from the NSW Court of Appeal’s decision in Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234

[4] When the owner sought leave to appeal from the Victorian Court of Appeal’s decision in Sopov v Kane Constructions Pty Limited (No.2) [2009] VSCA 141

[5] Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd v Mann (Building and Property) [2016] VCAT 2100



*This is general information only, and does not constitute specific legal advice. Please consult one of our experienced Legal Team for specific advice relevant to your situation.

Supporting Western Australians for more than 100 years

"Always fast and thorough service. Thank you"

Sitka Pil

"My circumstances at the time I made contact with HHG were dire following my argument being rejected by two no win no fee firms. Following my initial meeting with HHG's employment law team I was left feeling extremely positive by the response and concern shown by HHG in regards to their support of my argument along with their preparedness to pursue an outcome on my behalf.

I accept the fact that nobody really wins in these cases (mental health/ workplace) however the end result was what would be considered most favourable and far in excess of what would have been achieved had I not sought the advice from HHG.

I have no hesitation in recommending HHG to anyone caught up in the messy circumstances I found myself in at the time.

Great advice and five-star commitment to their client!!"

Nathan Lynch

"Thank you for such great assistance with the transaction of Flying Domestics on behalf of Lorna Good. It has been such a pleasure to work with the HHG Legal Group and I look forward to working with you in the future."

Jim Goodwin

"Simon Creek and his team were at all times empathic, professional and confident.  My matter needed to be addressed within a pressing time frame, and their availability at short notice and contact after hours was much appreciated.  It caused me considerable stress, but having such a thoroughly reliable and competent team to call on helped me to feel in control. Although I hope not to need their services again in future, I would be confident in doing so!"

Dr Lana Bell

"A good outcome is what we can expect.  A great outcome is a sign of a company which does the very best for their clients. A very big thank you to Daniel Morris for showing empathy towards my small and much needed legal action.

To HHG Legal Group, thank you for a great outcome.  I would recommend your company to anyone seeking legal services."

Jan Atkinson

"Your support this morning was amazingly kind, not to mention your totally reassuring competence, knowledge and wisdom that you used on my behalf.  It was extremely reassuring to have your knowledgeable support, and I particularly appreciated your real and obvious kindness to me. It means so much at a very difficult time. I'm so grateful to you."

Family Law Client

"Janene was very professional and we established a good rapport quickly. The subject of death and wills can be quite confronting to deal with, however, Janene's approach was soft and accommodating."

Lynette Livesey

"A big thank you to HHG for their professional service, continued support, and wide range of legal knowledge. Our clients have given us nothing but kind words regarding HHG Legal Group and so we have no hesitation in referring and recommending Simon Creek and HHG Legal Group for their outstanding services and legal expertise."

Nigel Plowman, Director at Mckinley Plowman & Associates

"Simon is a friendly and practical legal advisor. I have received great feedback from the clients I have referred to him and his team at HHG Legal Group."

Richard Beal, Director at BDO

"Over the last few years, I have been impressed by Simon’s legal ability, management skills, entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity and people skills. He appears to be that rare breed of lawyer – both knowledgeable and commercial."

Michael Malone, Founder of iiNet

"Our family has been a client of HHG Legal Group over many years.  Business has included drawing up of wills for three generations and preparing of probate for my father in law. I would have no hesitation in recommending HHG Legal Group to anyone requiring such services."

Bernice Climie

"You should be congratulated for the manner in which your staff address clients and we found our dealings with your company, once again a very pleasant experience and we would like to truly thank you for your efforts."

Steve Harvey and Jane Powell

"HHG Legal were absolutely fantastic. Extremely responsive and brought calm to our chaotic family situation through their knowledge and caring attitude. Extremely professional from our very first contact with them and they expertly guided our family though the required legal process over almost a 12 month period."

Amanda Williamson

"Fantastic team! They really care about their client. Tim Colcutt is a 'go that extra mile' guy who gives his client his all. I can't recommend HHG and Tim enough."

Kerry Samson

"I had a fantastic lawyer in Matthew Lilly. He helped me out a great deal with good, sound advice in a friendly, professional manner. First class, thanks Matthew"

Graeme Hammond

"Marine Plant Systems has been working with HHG Legal Group for a few years now and they continually provide first-class service. Their professional advice has been invaluable to our company."

Carolin Grimm - Marine Plant Systems

"We were kept up to date at all times. Pricing was always updated over the time period so we remained "in budget". Personal access to someone whenever I had questions. All in all a great experience without too much fuss."

Rosslyn Tasker - COO Altusq Pty Ltd

"Good service you can count on."

Miles Lee

"HHG Legal Group has provided outstanding support as I have taken the journey of buying a business, their professionalism is beyond reproach. Their assistance throughout the Due Diligence process has been invaluable, I would fully recommend them."

Mark Armitage

"Very friendly and efficient service - what a pleasure working with Matthew."

Jacques Taylor

"I highly recommend Daniel from HHG Lawyer in Mandurah. When dealing with a complicated legal property matter recently I was extremely impressed by Daniel's honesty and integrity and the legal advice I received. I am very happy with the service from HHG Legal."

Tony Walker

"Lisa, thank you so much for representing me in court, honestly, I would not have had the outcome I got without you. Once again, Thank you so much."


"Matthew Lilly was excellent in processing our project. He achieved the excellent result that we required on our project.

We would give Matthew a 5 star rating.

We will definitely commission Matthew for any further projects if we have the need."


"I have had the pleasure of being represented by Ms Lisa Riley. Lisa helped me in December 2020 when I was charged. Lisa was extremely supportive, reassuring, and preserved with her investigation of the laws and was able to save me from a terrible outcome. Another incident occurred in August 2021 in which I sought Lisa’s help. Lisa preserved and was very patient with me. This only got resolved this year. When she advised me that she was leaving her old firm, I insisted that she remain my lawyer, as I had the utmost faith in her. Hence I moved over to HHG. Lisa took no shortcuts in my defence and continued to preserve for the toxicology report that ultimately saved me. She kept me up-to-date with the progress and provided support. Having someone as understanding as Lisa was a huge gift, to me and my family. You have gained a huge asset in Lisa joining your firm.

Thank you, Lisa, forever grateful for your work, and if ever needed, I will be sure to refer to you"


"We can highly recommend HHG Legal Group and particularly Mr Blair Campbell (Special Counsel / Dispute Resolution)

Blair worked with us as we navigated a very difficult third party dispute.

Blair’s expertise, wisdom, and the way he guided us in a very measured and calm manner gave us great encouragement and comfort. Blair helped us to focus on what we needed to and to trust the process.

Blair was always responsive to us, he always got back to us very promptly to answer our questions and to help us to step through some really hard days.

We are very grateful for Blair’s expertise and wisdom along with his empathy and care, this truly made the difference for us."

Wayne and Janice Belcher

Preferred office location:

Please select your nearest office location so we can show you the most relevant information.